<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Drop Nancy Pelosi &#187; senate</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.droppelosi.com/tag/senate/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.droppelosi.com</link>
	<description>A grassroots effort to expose Nancy Pelosi</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 20 Jan 2010 07:19:07 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Abortion, Healthcare &amp; the Catholic Church</title>
		<link>http://www.droppelosi.com/2009/12/abortion-healthcare-the-catholic-church/</link>
		<comments>http://www.droppelosi.com/2009/12/abortion-healthcare-the-catholic-church/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Dec 2009 01:12:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>drop pelosi</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Gov. Subsidies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Healthcare]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tax]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[abortion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[catholic]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[church]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[senate]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.droppelosi.com/?p=460</guid>
		<description><![CDATA["I don't care how popular I am. I'm not putting myself out there to run for higher office. I just [want to] make sure that we win the election next year," she said.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img class="alignright size-full wp-image-463" title="LifeNewsPic" src="http://www.droppelosi.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/12/LifeNewsPic.jpg" alt="LifeNewsPic" width="210" height="184" /><strong>Life News reports:</strong></p>
<p>The rift between House Speaker Nancy Pelosi and the Catholic Church will likely grow thanks to new comments the abortion advocate made. Pelosi said in a new interview that the &#8220;free will&#8221; of women wanting abortions outweighs pro-life Catholic teachings.</p>
<p>Newsweek&#8217;s Eleanor Clift conducted a year-end interview with Pelosi.</p>
<p>The conversation turned to the topic of abortion and health care and Pelosi blasted the Catholic bishops for their opposition to the pro-abortion bill.</p>
<p>She tells Clift it was frustrating that Catholic bishops &#8220;were not willing to accept what we know to be a fact&#8221; &#8212; that the &#8220;public option&#8221; would supposedly not violate a ban on federally-funded abortions.</p>
<p>Then, as Clift asks about her &#8220;brushes&#8221; with the church, Pelosi drops a bomb.</p>
<p>&#8220;I have some concerns about the church&#8217;s position respecting a woman&#8217;s right to choose,&#8221; Pelosi responds. &#8220;I am a practicing Catholic, although they&#8217;re probably not too happy about that. But it is my faith.&#8221;</p>
<p>[…]</p>
<p>The comments will likely throw fuel on the fire of public opinion within pro-life and Catholic circles that Pelosi is well-outside the mainstream &#8212; but she tells the pro-abortion Newsweek reporter she doesn&#8217;t care.</p>
<p>[…]</p>
<p>For Pelosi, her motive appears to be more about winning than her reputation and standing.</p>
<p>&#8220;I don&#8217;t care how popular I am. I&#8217;m not putting myself out there to run for higher office. I just [want to] make sure that we win the election next year,&#8221; she said.</p>
<p>The new comments follow on the heels of Pelosi thanking God that the Senate health care bill funds abortions.</p>
<p><a title="December 28, 2009" href="http://www.lifenews.com/state4686.html">Read in full, December 28, 2009</a></p>
<p>In yet another comment that will draw guffaws from pro-life advocates, House Speaker Nancy Pelosi is thankful to God that the Senate bill include massive abortion funding. Pelosi also claims she has enough votes to pass a pro-abortion health care bill in the House, though that is disputed.</p>
<p>The Senate bill, unlike the House government-run health care measure, funds abortions though the public option and affordability credits.</p>
<p>[…]</p>
<p>The Senate bill &#8220;doesn&#8217;t have a public option, doesn&#8217;t expand Medicare for the (age) 55 to 64 group, and has abortion language that is completely different from the House &#8212; thank God.&#8221;</p>
<p>Pelosi told reporters she believes the House can approve the Senate bill or a merged conference committee measure even without the Stupak amendment the House added on a large bipartisan vote to remove abortion funding.<a title="December 17, 2009" href="http://lifenews.com/nat5781.html "></a></p>
<p><a title="December 17, 2009" href="http://lifenews.com/nat5781.html ">Read in full, December 17, 2009</a></p>
<p>Attorney Mary Harned of Americans United for Life, has also examined the abortion sections of Reid&#8217;s new measure, which she says &#8220;provides for an unprecedented expansion of federally-funded abortion. &#8221;</p>
<p>&#8220;The bill includes pro-abortion language and mirrors the false compromise Capps Amendment from the House debate — it allows the public option to include abortion coverage and provides federal subsidies for private plans which cover abortion,&#8221; she said.</p>
<p><a title="November 19, 2009" href="http://www.lifenews.com/nat5682.html">Read in full, November 19, 2009</a></p>
<input id="gwProxy" type="hidden" />
<p><!--Session data--></p>
<input id="jsProxy" onclick="jsCall();" type="hidden" />
<input id="gwProxy" type="hidden" />
<input id="jsProxy" onclick="jsCall();" type="hidden" />
<input id="gwProxy" type="hidden" />
<input id="jsProxy" onclick="jsCall();" type="hidden" />
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.droppelosi.com/2009/12/abortion-healthcare-the-catholic-church/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>5</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Want More Gov.? Here&#8217;s $447 Billion&#8230;</title>
		<link>http://www.droppelosi.com/2009/12/want-more-gov-heres-447-billion/</link>
		<comments>http://www.droppelosi.com/2009/12/want-more-gov-heres-447-billion/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Dec 2009 19:33:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>drop pelosi</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Featured]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Flip-Flop]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gov. Subsidies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jobs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tax]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bailout]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[debt]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[senate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[wine]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.droppelosi.com/?p=414</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[December 10th the House passed a $447 billion bill to boost spending for government operations, to the Speaker&#8217;s delight.  The 2,444-page bill proposed a 14% spending increase.  It received not [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img class="alignleft size-medium wp-image-416" title="BigGov" src="http://www.droppelosi.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/12/BigGov-300x199.jpg" alt="BigGov" width="300" height="199" />December 10th the House passed a $447 billion bill to boost spending for government operations, to the Speaker&#8217;s delight.  The 2,444-page bill proposed a 14% spending increase.  It received not one Republican vote, <a title="read article" href="http://www.newsdaily.com/stories/tre5b94ac-us-usa-congress-spending/">News Daily</a>.</p>
<p>Sunday the Senate passed the $447 billion spending bill with a number of earmarks (5,224 special spending requests) totaling $3.9 billion.  The Peterson-Pew panel calls for immediate action to stabilize our GDP to debt ratio at 60%, according to the <a title="read article" href="http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?file=/c/a/2009/12/15/MNFJ1B413V.DTL">San Francisco Gate</a>.  Our GDP to debt ratio is estimated to be <a title="Wikipedia" href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_public_debt">over 90%</a> by the end of this year.  Soon, more than 100% of our gross domestic product will be used to service our national debt.</p>
<blockquote><p>Pelosi has opposed the idea, and so has the powerful retiree group AARP. But Pelosi now would agree to it as long as a &#8220;pay-as-you-go&#8221; budget rule favored by conservative &#8220;Blue Dog&#8221; House Democrats is included.</p>
<p>That would require new spending to be offset by spending cuts or tax increases.</p>
<p>[...]</p>
<p>Sen. John McCain, R-Ariz., has railed about stimulus pork, singling out for ridicule $54 million going to Napa Valley&#8217;s &#8220;wine train.&#8221;</p></blockquote>
<p>&#8220;Wine train&#8221;?  Conflict of interest anyone?  If you&#8217;re unaware, Pelosi and her husband <a title="read article" href="http://www.bestgolfs.com/?p=4313">own a vineyard</a> worth up to $25 million in Napa Valley.</p>
<p>John Boehner represents Ohio&#8217;s 8th district in the House.  He strongly criticizes Pelosi&#8217;s actions in the <a title="read article" href="http://www.timesgazette.com/main.asp?SectionID=1&amp;SubSectionID=382&amp;ArticleID=169795">Hillsboro Times-Gazette</a>.</p>
<blockquote><p>On Thursday, House Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.) completed the latest chapter in this lengthy story by ramming a massive $447 billion spending bill through Congress that contains double-digit funding increases to Washington agencies.</p>
<p>In addition to these excessive increases, the bill includes more than 5,200 earmarks, including $300,000 for music and education programs at New York City&#8217;s Carnegie Hall, where they pay the employee who oversees the props more than $530,000 in salary and benefits.  Regardless of whether these are worthy projects, are they really more important than our children and grandchildren, who will have to repay the debt we&#8217;re piling up to do all this stuff?</p>
<p>[...]</p>
<p>This is just another ploy to increase spending at a time when our national debt hit a record $12 trillion last month.  Before the end of the year, Democrats plan to raise the debt limit by another $1.8 trillion dollars.</p></blockquote>
<input id="gwProxy" type="hidden" />
<input id="jsProxy" onclick="jsCall();" type="hidden" />
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.droppelosi.com/2009/12/want-more-gov-heres-447-billion/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>28</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

